Your board expects accurate data.
Your reps want zero admin work.
Talqo delivers both.
Talqo reads every sales call and turns it into pipeline you can trust — deal by deal, scored on what was actually said, not what was logged.
46 of 47 extractions correct on our published benchmark — including the one we got wrong. See how we measure →Budget round is likely October but may have moved; no budget amount or confirmed allocation discussed.
Rep sends requirement-document category framework to Kjell. Kjell asks Solveig about whether the budget round has moved from its usual October slot and feeds that back to the rep.
What you are looking at. The call is constructed to be representative — it is not a customer call, and nobody in it is real. The analysis is real: it is the unedited output of the same Talqo you would run. See the whole call and the whole output →
Context, not our evidence: reps spend around 5.5 hours a week on CRM admin (Salesforce); AI-assisted sellers are reported as 3.7× more likely to hit quota (Gartner, 2024) and to see 30%+ higher win rates (Bain, 2025). Those are industry figures about AI in general. They are not measurements of Talqo, and we don't present them as our results.
Which of your pipeline can you actually defend?
Your CRM knows what was entered. Talqo knows what was said — so it splits your open number into what's validated and what isn't, with a receipt on every deal it can't yet stand behind.
28% of this pipeline cannot be defended with anything that was said on a call.
€340k of €1.2M open — the share Talqo could not tie to a confirmed buyer, budget or next step. Every euro in it has a named reason below.
A deal is a conversation,
not a call.
Most tools score a call and move on. The next call starts from nothing, and by call eight nobody can say what was actually established — only what the last person remembered.
Talqo keeps the thread. Every call is added to the deal, in order, and the deal holds the strongest evidence any call produced — not the most recent one. The champion confirmed in May is still confirmed in July, even if nobody has mentioned him since.
Open any dimension and you get the receipt: which call established it, on what date, and the sentence it came from.
One call. Four things, ready from one transcript.
Talqo reads the transcript and creates a chain of commercial intelligence. The rep gets coached. The manager gets briefed. The CRM fields are written for you to approve — nothing lands in your system of record on its own.
What it actually looks like
Four views from the same call, shown on a sample account. Each one built for a different person in your organisation — without anyone having to ask for it.
Real screenshots of Talqo, captured from the running product on — not mock-ups, not illustrations. The figures come from our demo dataset: sample data, real analysis. When the product changes, these are re-captured.
The mirror rule
Every word your manager reads about you, you read too.
Not a summary of it — the same text, word for word. The manager's view is built from the rep's own screen, so Talqo cannot say one thing to a rep and another about them upstairs.
There is no hidden manager view. No private score. No report about a rep that the rep cannot open and read in full.
This is enforced in the code and locked by tests, not left to good intentions — the check asserts every key matches word for word, so the day someone writes a manager-only sentence, the build fails.
Why we built it this way: a rep who trusts the tool tells it the truth. A rep who suspects it is reporting on them behind their back starts managing what it sees — and the moment that happens, every number built on top of it is worthless. Rep trust is not a nice-to-have here. It is the thing that makes the forecast real.
Five states, and it earns each one.
A price is not "agreed" because a rep felt good about the call. Every deal sits in one of these, and the sentence underneath is the one Talqo actually prints.
Price accepted on the call.
Price stated, no objection raised.
Price discussed, not accepted.
No price discussed on any call.
Reversed on a later call. Not a worse grade of agreement — off the scale entirely. The buyer accepted a price and then took it back, in their own words. Talqo keeps both quotes and shows the reversal beside the thing it reversed, because a fact that quietly disappears is worse than one never captured.
The bar is deliberately high: an explicit reversal, a verbatim quote, and a named fact. Hesitation is not reversal.
The four run best to worst, left to right. “Unconfirmed” means nobody discussed it — it is not where Talqo puts a deal it is unsure about. A deal the buyer pushed back on reads not accepted, which is a different fact and ranks differently.
“yes, even at that number it clears our budget — let’s proceed”
No score without a source. If we cannot show you the sentence, we do not show you the number.
Your CRM, whichever one it is.
Talqo writes the fields you approve into the system you already use. What's live today:
No IT approval needed
to find out if it works.
Talqo runs today without touching your tech stack — paste a transcript, get structured intelligence in seconds. CRM write-back is live for Salesforce, HubSpot and anything else via webhook; connect it when you're ready.
Who it's built for
One lever for the week, with the sentence from the call it came from — not a scorecard.
One row per rep, ordered by how long since you last coached them. Never by score.
Deal stage, value and close date written to Salesforce or HubSpot — on your approval, every write reversible.
The share of pipeline a customer actually confirmed out loud, and the receipts under it.
Built on a foundation of trust
We handle sensitive sales conversation data. That's why we're honest about where we are — and where we're headed.
How often is Talqo wrong?
We publish the number, the method, and the call it got wrong. Last run 11 August 2026.
The one we got wrong: on a call where the buyer opened with a rival vendor’s quote and asked us to match it, Talqo asserted a value of 290 where the call supports none. It is published because a benchmark with no misses in it is a brochure. The method, and the call we got wrong →
Give us one call.
You'll have our read the same day.
Send one call — real or anonymised — and we'll send back exactly what Talqo produced from it: the deal facts, the coaching, and the things it refused to score. A person reads every one. No demo script, no slides, no obligation.
By sending a transcript you're asking us to analyse it and reply. We use your details only to respond — no marketing list, no third party, and we don't keep the transcript after we've sent your read back. Want it gone sooner? Reply to our email or write to hello@talqo.dk and we'll remove your transcript and your details, and confirm when it's done. If the call has a customer's name in it, anonymise it first — or ask us to, and we will before anything else happens.